Thursday, December 1, 2011

Newt Gingrich is the latest dumb ass, tells Occupy Movement to shower and get a job.

Sigh, the one mainstream republican that I thought had a certain level of necessary intelligence, Newt Gingrich, is a dumb ass, and he proved it with this ridiculously stupid anti Occupy babble during a recent Republican debate. 

That leaves Ron Paul and Hillary Clinton as my two choices, er, make that one choice at the moment.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Newt Gingrich, latest victim of ultra left and ultra right attack machines after Newt reaches out to Moderate and Middle America on Meet the Press.

If you want to see how easy it is for the far left and the far right to destroy any candidate that speaks up for the middle majority in this country, then watch the video above.

Newt Gingrich said NOTHING CONTROVERSIAL, and yet, he was villified by the Rush Limbaugh's of the world while the left remained silent, and the middle is left with no voice once again.

Whether you like Newt Gingrich, or don't like Newt Gingrich, in this instance Gingrich took the superior intellectual ground and was slammed into the dirt by the main stream media for doing so.

I shortened the 3 minute clip to the first 34 seconds because that is the part that has been shown over and over in inciting Republicans against Newt Gingrich. You can watch the rest of the video by clicking on the continue arrow that will appear once the the clip stops.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

NewsMax Reports Gallup Poll: 52% of Republicans want Third Party.

This is what I have been saying for the past couple of years. Ever since MSNBC tore the heart out of the Democratic party and Hillary Clinton Supporters as well, a third party AND a third cable news network that is exactly in the middle from where FOX and MSNBC stand is NEEDED.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

The U.S. Government may be using HAMP to swindle homeowners out of their homes.

Above may be an example of a violation of the Federal Hobbs Act, the extortion clause. The U.S. government has set up a TAXPAYER FUNDED program called Home Affordable Mortgage Protection (HAMP) that PENALIZES taxpayers before they can even become eligible to apply for HAMP.

Before a homeowner is eligible to apply for HAMP, they must first fall 2-4 mortgage payments behind. At this point, Parallel Foreclosure has already commenced in which foreclosure paperwork is BEING PREPARED even before the homeowner is eligible to apply for HAMP.

But it's worse than that.

Once the HAMP application is filled out, the HAMP applicants credit score is ambushed and lowered. BEFORE the HAMP applicant has even finished the initial set of trial payments, the banksters are processing foreclosure paperwork on the homeowner's home and the homeowners credit rating has been trashed as well.

But it's worse than that.

The reduced payments offered to the homeowner during the HAMP trial period suddenly become a mirage and revert back to the regular payment amount if HAMP is denied. The homeowner is also retroactively penalized and must pay the difference between the original mortgage amount and the HAMP amount for every month they were on the HAMP trial!

But it's worse than that.

The desire by the mortgage servicers to deny HAMP looms in the background because the mortgage servicers get to assess penalties and fees for ALL of the reduced HAMP trial payment months, and the servicers get paid first once the home is repossessed and resold.

But it's worse than that.

Fees are also assessed against the foreclosed upon homeowner related to the RE-SELLING of the foreclosed home!

But it's worse than that.

The homeowners faith in the HAMP program ultimately leads to having less options and less time available to figure out what to do if they are incapacitated by a HAMP denial. You see, the banks have been accused of losing paperwork, forcing homeowners to file and refile and refile the same paperwork, then having to start over if they don't fit the filing with a very specific time frame.

A sadist could not design a more criminal program, and the commercial above tops it all off.

So, who will stop this madness?

The dumbocrats, who just want to keep their congressional seat and will just go along with the White House?

The Republicants? Well, not the republicants that never met a bankster they did not like and who are willing to trade social security for more military expenditures.

Ralph Nader? I think Ralph Nader is afraid.

That leaves third party political parties. Nope, the temptation to use HAMP to promote one's own party's values will be difficult to overcome.

A consortium of third party political parties, could they band together and make noise about HAMP???? (you tell me).

This probably leaves the 50 attorney's generals as the best choice to stop this nonsense and prosecute the offenders.

Can't third party political parties just "get along" and make a difference before main street is completely decimated?

Monday, January 3, 2011

Republican Hypocrisy - Trading Social Security for Military Spending.

Many many years ago on another site I said that for every dollar the United States spends on anything to do with the military, they should spend another dollar on renewable energy that does not include nuclear or coal. Instead, our republican friends want to subtract a dollar from social security for every dollar they spend on the military.

Solar Energy can work. Hardened solar plastics could be used to make lightweight automobiles that could recharge themselves over a two day cycle. The lightened cars (with the fewer batteries needed to run them but which would still weigh down the car in high wind situations) would need much less power to run. The hardened solar plastic exteriors would continually be recharging. These hardened plastic cars would be sold in pairs, so the owners can alternate their usage, thus doubling their recharge time for a car that is much lighter.

The petroleum being wasted in heavier cars as fuel could actually be used to make the hardened solar plastics for cars that would then run on solar. Even if the charging fell short, the much lighter car would still need less of a charge from the grid. These much lighter cars might even run off of 12 volt instead of 24 volt technology as well.

More hydroelectric energy is needed. A classic example exists in the middle of our own country called the Mississippi River. We could do some amazing things with the Mississippi River that could prevent flooding along the banks, create hydroelectric energy, and possibly create a new potting industry called Mississippi mud, and put a lot of people to work making it happen.

By dredging the bottom of the mississippi river the chance of flooding would be reduced, hydroelectric energy would reduce dependence on non-renewable resources, and the mud at the bottom of the mississippi that would be dredged up could be sold as potting soil.

Wind energy is still in its infancy. I don't believe the ideal wind energy design has been invented yet. If we can't afford to spend dollar for dollar between the military and renewable energy, the world won't be able to sustain all the petroleum that will remain in demand even as we spend more money fighting for a diminishing return.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Independents lost an opportunity by not embracing the Clinton's centrism of the 90's.

I found it surprising that most of the independent leaning candidates did not mention the Bill Clinton presidency of the 90's in their platform speeches. Bill Clinton reduced the federal operating budget the 8 consecutive years he was in office, and was the only president to do that in the past 80 years.

Bill Clinton is also the only president in the past 80 years to leave office more popular than when he arrived. Yet, all most independent candidates talk about is the constitution. The flaw with this thinking is the constitution was written before virtually any of the modern day amenities existed!

It becomes rather simplistic to say follow the constitution when during constitution tines there was no power grid, no gas grid, no sewage, no fresh water on tap, no agreed upon roadway standard and so on. It is unfortunate that republican leaning independents are above embracing what works, even if it comes from the democratic side of the political spectrum, and it is sad that democrats were too afraid to fight back against the Pelosi, Reid coup of 2008.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Don't Vote Latino YouTube Video sends a powerful message, but why not vote 3rd Party?

The Latino "Don't Vote" campaign makes sense. However, how about voting third party instead of not voting at all?

Friday, October 1, 2010

Where have all the INDEPENDENTS Gone, long time passing...

It seems to me that the mainstream media chose to make a huge deal out of tea party candidates that defeated republican candidates, at the expense of independent candidates everywhere. Who does the independent candidate get to battle between now and the November vote?

Unless an independent turns tea party republican candidate to face an existing republican candidate, (and to a lesser extent turning into a democratic candidate to face an existing democratic candidate), the independent candidate is ignored. The mainstream media has created a huge whirlwind around a few tea party candidates who won republican contests while ignoring true independents who may already be on the November ballot and have no one to "fight" until then.

If you go into the ballot box in November and next to the democrat and republican candidates you suddenly see a slew of independent candidates names, don't be afraid to vote independent.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Tennessee Guerilla Women: San Francisco Chronicle Endorses 'None of the Above'

This is HUGE NEWS! The San Francisco Chronicle Endorses "none of the above" in the Carly Fiorina vs Barbara Boxer California senate race. Maybe "independents day" is not that as far off as we are led to believe".

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Hating the Democrats is not necessarily a good enough reason to vote Republican.

There is huge discontent with both parties right now. I believe the obvious answer is not to vote for either a democrat or a republican in the fall elections. Don't be afraid to "waste your vote" on a third party candidate.

Your vote is going to be wasted if you vote democrat or republican.

If not now, when?